science leans toward circumcision helping. You do much more traumatic things to the baby when you squeeze it through a vaginal canal for very marginal gains down-the-road. It's not abuse or mutilation unless your head is so far gone into the clouds. LOLz
-
No... it's illuminating the point of trade-offs. F'n idiot. Yes, penile cancer rate is way higher than rate of botched circumcisions in modern hospitals. Reduced STI transmission means far less for others. There are nearly no downsides to a circumcision. You're bad at math. Stop
If there are no downsides to circumcision, why not wait to do them and let boys decide when they're adults whether to get them? It should be an easy pitch to make, right?
-
-
I dunno, man. My brother got circumcised as an adult. It made a vasectomy look like a haircut.
-
You see, there ARE many downsides to male genital cutting at any age. Why did he have it done? It's rarely necessary. US doctors are ignorant of the alternatives.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And men hardly ever choose or need to get it done, which ought to tell you all you need to know about cutting babies.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.