Miller. This is counter-intuitive, all the while an reduction of current existential risks, such as destroying atomic weapons would only lead to even greater existential risk. Who would defend us if, say, ISIS got their hands on such weapons, and ours was destroyed?
-
-
-
How do we deter ISIS with nukes?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I've literally been told by a leading SJW that 'worrying about nuclear war is white privilege'
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
I’ve always taken heat for my opinion that the only way to “save the environment” is to save the humans first. Get the 3rd world out of poverty by whatever means necessary as fast as possible and the rest will take care of itself. Environmentalism is a first world problem.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The only thing that really matters are cute little kiddos preparing to colonize Mars.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ain't nobody got time for that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You're the Lord Varys of Twitter (minus the whole eunuch thing).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Agreed.
#Foreverism follows from the fact that "if a behavior does not exist, then it is necessarily not good." The only way to avoid that "not good" outcome is to perpetuate your subscriptions (genes/behaviors/etc), without end. The array of subscriptions must increase, too.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
