My preservationist heuristic: anybody who wants to tear down statues, blow up monuments, erase names from buildings, burn books, or obliterate the past in any way, is an enemy of civilization and a bad actor.pic.twitter.com/UOPbiJDyLB
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
If a statue depicts something horrible that doesn’t represent the values of our society, why keep it up for the general public? Why not move it to a museum?
Presumably the statue represents some of the community, or it wouldn't be there. Moving it to a museum where a display can explain it's full context sounds reasonable to me.
The speech if people that can afford statues you mean?
It's important to remember monuments are the speech of the elite; still speech and part of history. But they don't necessarily represent the whole community. Statues of people like MLK indicate MLK is accepted among elites.
You certainly shouldn’t censor history but statues are a weird way that we allow public land/funding to mobilize an agenda. A book can be ignored but a statue in the city square is a constant sign of belittlement for some.
Some statues are functionally nothing but litter, though. No historical value, no artistic value, not even that old.
Nah. We can use our heads here.
You’re assuming that Geoffrey has one. He once did.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.