Evolutionary psychology doubters need to read this paper so that they can see/appreciate the level of sophistication in the theorizing/methods:https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084854?journalCode=clinpsy …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’ve never read an EP thinker who only postulated the existence of domain-specific mechanisms and no general ones. This section baffles me
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Its really not caricature if they are citing papers. Gender whackos are wrong in their blank slatism, but that does not mean that some of the their criticisms of evo-psych are unfounded. There is a decided lack of epistemic rigor in most of "science" today, incl evo-psych ...
-
The caricature is not in citing, although it is done in a simplistic and condescending way, but in the conclusion, mainly "determined and fixed". If you want to criticize the methodology of Evo Psych you shouldn't straw-man it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.