Because this is about ideology, not science.
Hey @APA, why are you still ignoring evolution, sexual selection, female mate choice, animal behavior, biology, genetics, and hormones when preaching to men about masculinity?https://twitter.com/SPSMM_D51/status/1113499604446797824 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's bigotry and misandry in everything but name. The discipline of psychology has become nothing more than pseudo-religious; it's ideological puritanism preaching about "proper" social mores from up high. It should return to science.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can't they, at this stage, just go say a prayer, incant a spell, perform a ritual, and leave men alone. I think I preferred religious moralising. At the least they had an outlet by way of appeal to a divine being that didn't stink up my day like a diarrhetic fart.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because they sound hard. And hard things are patriarchal :-)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also, why are disparities assumed to be a moral negative?
-
Because otherwise there would be no way to justify selection for narrative.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
OK. I'm not sure what's going on. Would anyone kindly explain what's going on with respect to descriptive and prescriptive propositions made by APA?
-
https://www.apa.org/monitor/2019/01/ce-corner … this explains what's been happening
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They don’t like science...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They have been hijacked by charlatans
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.