What may be even sadder is that he really did understand the science.
-
-
-
He never understood hierarchical factor analysis, or the g factor. Which are the heart of intelligence research.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Pot. Kettle.
-
Developmental systems theory. Incoherent mess that ignores behavior genetics and has never yielded a replicable empirical insight.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
To me, a lesson on how even great scientists can fall prey to ideological bias
-
He was a great writer, but was he ever a great scientist? What did he discover, exactly?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Oh c’mon, Gould was not a charlatan even if his book is biased. Overusing that word cheapens it and makes people who use it look bad.
-
I don't use the word charlatan lightly. Gould was a charlatan on IQ.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
He was praised and mandatory reading in anthropology. Scholars like Huntington were demonized in the cultural classes where as Edward Said was elevated
-
Evopsych also got a lot of criticism as a racist field looking to bring back old tropes. Ita what made me look more into Evopsych
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.