Sort of. Except random assignment is crucial for inferring causation.
-
New conversation
-
-
-
I think that is the point of general elections, pick a candidate and see wtf happens. If poor people realize yang wants to write them checks every month I don’t see how he won’t win. Then the experiment will begin.
-
But we can't actually learn anything without random assignment and clear metrics of success...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
That was the original bloody idea. I have no idea why Oregon can’t be communist, Texas can be Libertaria with a twang, etc. I’d love to see completely new models used, too. We don’t know everything yet. Probably never will. Experimentation and testing are essential.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Stop using logic. There is no place left for it in the village square. We have been conditioned to use only base tribal emotions, with external sources ramping the intensity to 11. (much to our detriment)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's a good idea in theory, but I suspect that, in the vast majority of cases, the fact that states have very different internal political situations will prevent them from being able to coordinate in the systematic way that running an inter-state RCT would require.
-
Also, the antecedent assumes that we can be rational about such things when we are clearly incapable of doing so.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Isn't this the point of a federation of states? Something like this already happens. O 1 or 2 states legalize weed. Then when nothing too terrible happens a few more do ect.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I believe this is called federalism..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.