1. Many people for whom I have great respect (Haidt, Al-Gharbi) have made a variant of this argument: "We can't legislate an atmosphere of toleration and respect for diverse view points on the campus; therefore, an executive order is unlikely to promote free speech."
-
Show this thread
-
-
Replying to @mjaeckel
I thought you were more agnostic?? I didn’t want to attribute an opinion to you which you didn’t hold

1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EPoe187
Well, I did say that I don’t think an executive order can compel people to respect viewpoint diversity if they’re not willingly receptive to different ideas. I stand by that statement.
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @mjaeckel
True. I agree with that as well. But I think we can create the conditions that might allow viewpoint diversity to thrive
0 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
My point with the Title IX comparison is that those they think that govt should avoid action in increasing diversity should be against both Trump's EO and for abolishing Title IX and vice versa.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
If Congress hasn't already made the effort to protect free speech at universities, given all the censorship that's happened, what are the chances that they'd suddenly do so?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @PsychRabble @aClassicLiberal and
Exactly. Better an imperfect XO than nothing. If Congress hates the XO, then they can bloody well pass some laws that enforce public university compliance with
#1A.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes - 1 more reply
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
