Without seeing what the offending content was, how can we conclude that it was simply pronatalism? It seems highly unlikely to me that that was the reason. But I could be wrong.
So now social media companies are banning pronatalism? Interesting.https://twitter.com/sovereignfamily/status/1103371544879718400 …
-
-
-
Hard to tell, isn't it? That's exactly the problem with arbitrary censorship.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Hey, I'm the person who runs the account, and I couldn't tell you what it was. No idea at all. If they told me, I'd pinky swear to never post anything like that again. Unless of course it *is* pro-natalism, which is kind of the point of my account.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I used to follow that account. Looks like Twitter took him off my TL... following again now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Following them now just specifically because of that
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The idea that banning content related to those things is odd to me. The opposite of what is being claimed would be considered destructive behavior. Granted the content isn't shown, so all I can do is theorize.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
funny, my wife posts cute pics of our three kids all the time and her social media accounts are alive and well. Weird.
-
I'm arguing for people having more kids and my views on family are more right-wing than average. I don't know why I was banned from running ads, but I'm guessing someone didn't like my views.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.