Geoffrey MillerVerified account

Perplexed by @JonHaidt on this. He needs to read a couple of the books he wrote.

I agree. But intelligent speech cannot merge if the university is a venue where you wont get challenged. “The right to think the unthinkable, discuss the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable”. -Pauli Murray- https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/26/opinion/free-speech-yale-civil-rights.html …

You make a good point that contains a fatal flaw... “... intelligent and relevant speech that’s really important....” Intelligent and relevant speech? Fair enough. Here is the flaw... Who determines what is intelligent and relevant?

Horrible idea. Stop subsidizing universities with taxes, instead.

Do you remember the war against Eysenck? Caused a rethink by many left-leaning scientists.

The problem is that the executive is always a partisan position. Therefore, in the long run, it makes speech even more a partisan issue which it absolutely should not be. I think this is short term reward, long term risk

How would libertarians justify the execution of a XO, while simultaneously upholding the non-aggression principle?