Ideological diversity is our strength.https://twitter.com/NatureHumBehav/status/1102635822082416641 …
-
In other words, if my idea for good research is “aligned with biblical revelation”, and yours is “aligned with logic and evidence”, should the university take an agnostic view and hire us both to promote “ideological diversity”?
IMHO, if your biblical-inspired research gets the same citation counts, h-index, etc. as my darwinian-inspired research, then universities should be equally open to us both as candidates. I trust peer review more than I trust explicit diversity initiatives.
-
-
If the racial-diversity ideologues rig the peer review system to give their nonsense the same citation counts, h-index, etc then they get to maintain their stranglehold on the university. Your method is status-quo bias incarnate, it changes nothing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The whole problem *is the standard of review*. Your method of using skin deep publication statistics delivered by the status-quo authorities gives status quo authorities free reign to publish any degree of nonsense in their ideological circle with impunity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.