Weird how many people will unfollow you for saying Gould had meaningful contributions to evolutionary theory. Is this controversial or something now? I get he didn't like hereditarianism, but why overextend the argument so far against him?
-
Citing two tendentious and biased papers from obscure journals doesn't mske Gould correct. His key empirical critiques of IQ research remained wrong and he knew they were wrong. He had a Narrative to sell, and didn't care about the truth.
You could read some of my work on IQ on my website http://primalpoly.com if you want to know what I think.