Have been pondering my response to @JohnHolbein1 q about what good your field has done for the world. It feels strange to acknowledge that when your field has been applied in the real world, the net impact has been overwhelmingly negative (discrimination, genocide)https://twitter.com/drderringer/status/1099026921680236545 …
-
-
By designer babies & genetic engineering, I mean CRISPR & embryo selection & similar methods in-the-news based on specific identified variants (incl polygenic scores), not eg natural or sexual selection or assortative mating
-
Embryo selection based on polygenic scores for IQ seems a LOT more feasible than CRISPR for IQ, to be sure. And a lot closer to traditional natural selection in terms of population genetics.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Among the Ache, the rank-ordering you get from IQ tests is about the same as that you get from asking them who's cleverer. But when you think about, their way of life is really just like ours, except for agriculture, literacy, the wheel. and electricity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because intelligence is also selective. :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
