Weird how many people will unfollow you for saying Gould had meaningful contributions to evolutionary theory. Is this controversial or something now? I get he didn't like hereditarianism, but why overextend the argument so far against him?
-
please extrapolate "intellectually dishonest"? For curiosities sake, wondering if it means to you what it means to me.
He lied about the research from start to finish. Misrepresented it in almost every possible way to sell his political bias.
-
-
Ah, many thanks. Just like to keep my frame of reference clear.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.