Rowling took advantage of the notoriously lax anti-trust laws of the wizarding world.
-
-
-
Nope, just generous copyright protection.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Notably, at least the last 3 of those go in the "exploiting a monopoly" bucket, a monopoly granted by the copyright laws. So does Reich want to end copyright? Eliminate billionaires and make the world safe for Harry Potter fanfic?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
TSwift is a billionaire?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If social disciplines had the same rigor than mathematics, it would be clear that with only one counterexample of those you provided would suffice to invalidate completely the assertion made bu Mr. Reich
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only half that list are billionaires.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't believe his bias is sexist, although I doubt you really do either. His bias is against condemning those people whose products are themselves or their images. Celebrities and entertainers don't fit his neat pattern.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This individual considers the female believers to be part of an oppressed class. This ideology is about power and envy over those who have the freedom to pursue what they want.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because this all just connects to the idea of an old, preferrably boomer with a typically parted hair cut, white male. Any identity outside of that and Reich would NEVER be caught dead accusing them of not deserving what they have -- even over a billion dollars.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.