You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Well, no one is forced to engage in a conversation with another. Having seen some of Seder's schtick, I am not surprised that @RubinReport refuses to engage him. It's his right. I also despise ebola and seek to avoid it when possible.https://twitter.com/Nemesis4All/status/1092189209614532609 …
'Debates' between people who don't overlap a lot in their basic premises are usually a waste of time. Discussions between people who share some common ground is much better.
Idiotic. Debate is for the audience to listen, weigh responses, and gain insight. It matters only that the debaters agree to terms and protocol so each side may be fairly heard. The basic premise? One believes the market solves all and the other thinks that’s laughably naive.
How many times have you changed your mind while watching an adversarial 'debate', versus while overhearing a friendly discussion among like-minded people who happened to disagree about a particular point?
Debates need to be more mathematical.
Both are the same. Just mindless entrainment for people who want to feel intellectual without putting in any effort. The are both meaningless political performances.
In political debates, the only necessary overlap in basic premises is the use of public policy as a tool in effecting the social and material conditions of a population. Folks don’t have to agree on how to use that tool, nor to what end. That’s why we have political debates.
EvoPsych “academic” supports echo chambers. Shocker.
The Hitchens vs. Galloway debate is a good example of a debate falling apart. Though it did make me consider Galloway as even bigger of a scumbag.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
