"Where there's smoke there's fire" isn't even close to true. Why do we invoke it as if it were? Let's replace it with "Where there's thunder, there's lightning".
-
-
It’s not as catchy, but ‘Where there’s smoke, there’s a statistically greater chance of a fire being there also, compared to where there’s no smoke’.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It should be: Where there's smoke, don't be sure about the fire until you locate it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.