Basic game theory. You could run this simulation 1,000’s of times and same result: Team A - always defends its own side. Team B - defends its own side sometimes. Team A (the left) wins. There is no stopping it. The only question is how soon until they take total power.
Yeah, kinda. But that assumes no recruitment and no defections among teams. If Team B attracts smarter, more rational, more successful, more open-minded, more attractive people, by virtue of being less doctrinaire, they may win the long game...
-
-
On a long enough timeline, the most cruel and barbaric win because the good are too weak to stop them.
-
This is a related thought from the excellent
#VladimirBukovsky I love this quotepic.twitter.com/WcQuUBVf2P
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's still just for a chance, the odds are still heavily stacked for team A
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Since when rational ppl are persuasive in a world where facts don’t matter?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ideas win if their tribes reproduce more than the others.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are describing what Team A has already done. Team B has renounced those sensible strategies in the age of Trump. Team B recruits morons, marks, dupes, the irrational, the scared, the close-minded.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The thing is, team B won’t act like an actual team most of the time. Atomised individualists with no sense of solidarity get fucked by nepotistic & cohesive groups.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.