The best advice to those wishing to understand intelligence is to engage with literature on extreme performance. If IQ had been more correctly named “index of possible mental deficit”, the @charlesmurray industry would have never gotten off the ground.https://twitter.com/JamesPsychol/status/1082296723559645188 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I can't speak to Murray's motivations—but I strongly disagree with the rhetoric of "cognitive elite" that begins (and ends) in an equivocation between IQ and intelligence. And it's that rhetoric that ends up in
@primalpoly.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SimonDeDeo @charlesmurray
Or, you could try reading some of what I've actually written about intelligence. It's not hard to find on my web site:https://www.primalpoly.com/all-publications-by-topic/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @primalpoly @charlesmurray
Please provide evidence for your claim that an IQ over 130 meaningfully predicts performance in the Navy SEALs.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SimonDeDeo @charlesmurray
I never made that claim bro, and you know I didn't. I simply ran a quiz. 5000 people replied, and many thought an IQ of 130 would be ideal.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @primalpoly @charlesmurray
I am not your "bro", Geoffrey; in other parts of this exchange, you seem to acknowledge what your poll is intended to imply; your responses to me have consisted entirely of insults, appeals to authority, and bluster. I think it is best we disengage at this point.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
And yet, you keep re-engaging. Happy to agree to disagree. Namaste.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.