What % of the time do people tend to be 'morally right' about a controversial issue even if they're not 'factually right' about important, morally relevant aspects of the issue?
Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Are their experiences not subjective?
Their suffering is just as real to them as yours is to you. That's the point. It's not 'subjective' in the usual sense of 'uncertain' and 'prone to bias'
-
-
Nobody can doubt that people do experience suffering. I agree that *whether* a person is suffering could be objective in principle. But surely your ethic also needs to consider the *degree* of a person's suffering, right? How can that not be subjective?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.