Define real world success, I doubt we agree on that.
-
-
-
Pick any metric you want that reasonable people would consider related to 'success'.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'm starting to get the idea that alot of anti-IQ, and intelligence research folks are honestly only against it because such animosity is mainstream. We get alot of criticism, yet no alternatives.
-
Their only alternative seems to be 'IQ test don't predict real-world success as well as real-world success predicts real-world success'
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Your last sentence has been disproven by hundreds if not thousands of studies.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are empirically absolutely wrong. The g factor can be extracted from factor analysis of any set of reliable mental tests in any population. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics) …
-
Does one get the same g factor (or highly similar ones) when one extracts it from a battery of tests given to very different populations (in terms of ancestry, occupation, education, socioeconomic status)? How sample dependent is the g factor?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
isn't the criticism that such a measure doesn't exist and shouldn't be expected to exist?
-
And yet the measures do exist, and there are many good reasons why they should. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/58e2a71bf7e0ab3ba886cea3/t/58ebbdea197aea9c4054598c/1491844589895/2000+sexual+intelligence.pdf …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
We've been measuring general intelligence since 1904. So in what sense is it 'impossible'?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.