"IQ" THREAD "IQ" measures an inferior form of intelligence, stripped of 2nd order effects, meant to select paper shufflers, obedient IYIs. 1- When someone asks you a question in REAL LIFE, you focus first on "WHY is he asking me that?", which slows down. (Fat Tony vs Dr John)
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @nntaleb
Nassim, I have huge respect for you, but you really don't know what you're talking about wrt intelligence. You should stop and read more. This is embarrassing. Seriously.
32 replies 32 retweets 482 likes -
Replying to @primalpoly
You are expressing yourself like an imbecile, Geoffrey. I've read your crap on IQ, you shd refrain from writing w/o thinking.
22 replies 26 retweets 397 likes -
Replying to @nntaleb @primalpoly
Distributional assumptions of IQ don't hold in practice BTW. IQ distribution has a skew (we see ppl w/200 IQ or higher, but no one w/<0 IQ) and has a relatively fatter right tail.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
There are no reliable IQ tests that can score above about 160. Anyone who claims otherwise needs to document what exact test they're using.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.