Geoffrey MillerVerified account

That may be because the explantions that deal with psychology are fairly shoddy, wouldn't you agree? That level of emergent

I would recommend it as a book about science and epistemology and, therefore, relevant in any conversation re: morality. This might, as an added benefit, help someone solving problems in the field of psychology, but it’s not a book that much cares about that subject in particular

What do you object to, specifically? Is it that a human mind is a universal computer, universal in its ability to create open-ended explanatory knowledge, to anticipate and criticise its own computations - such that inborn ideas can be rendered irrelevant? Or something else?

@sapinker and @SamHarrisOrg cite Beginning of Infinity as one of their most highly recommended books. That's a very useful heuristic indeed. You should take his ideas seriously and read the books.

Which measures of subjective well-being were you referring to above?