If you want to get serious about managing climate change, you need to support nuclear energy. @Greenpeace is delusional on this issue.
Here a moderately funny Dutch guy explains why nuclear is great, in just 19 minutes. (Turn on YouTube subtitles if you don't understand Dutch).https://twitter.com/sapinker/status/1075580990289035270 …
-
-
Replying to @primalpoly @Greenpeace
I agree with you on this. The arguments against nuclear are two: 1. Nuclear bombs are dangerous. 2. Radiation is scary. Both emotional arguments. Reality: Nuclear plants are well-engineered by thoughtful people working practical realities with a long history of success.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Fukishima - see also Chernobyl...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Can you name all of the other nuclear plants that have not yet had problems? When you can, I'll respond to your challenge. Humans have the natural instinct on focussing on what is dangerous, while ignoring what is good, which is my point and GMs. Make a rational case.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Still suffering the effects of Fukishima, Chernobyl still uninhabitable. Do you live within 30 miles of a nuclear plant as I do? I do not need to make a case or do your research for you, Twitter is a social media commentary site.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
You didn't even bother to watch the video that I linked, did you.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.