She never claimed more than a little
A long NY Times piece about Elizabeth Warren's DNA test results that carefully avoids mentioning the DNA test results: she has very little Native American ancestry. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/06/us/politics/elizabeth-warren-dna-test-2020.html#click=https://t.co/W2knyXTYeG …
-
-
-
She claimed enough to benefit from affirmative action.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
If they wanted to take her down, why didn't they explain that the results show she lied?
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
Why is it considered a big deal? Because any insinuation that race exists or can be measured makes some people outraged, using ethnic membership to gain benefits makes other people outraged and everyone else doesn't like Elizabeth Warren anywayhttps://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1070676918670909440 …
-
Doesn't she only have like a 50% approval rating in Massachusetts? I've never understood why the press tries to make her a thing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
To succeed in US politics a hefty portion of the population needs to find you likeable. Sadly for her, Senator Warren's DNA test found her to be missing the pertinent alleles.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- End of conversation
-
-
-
They even manage to criticize Trump more than Warren!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.