If I were to support these organizations would I still be allowed to have Bacon? Yes this is an important question.
-
-
-
Yes, arguably. There's this concept of 'moral offsetting': if you donate enough money to these groups, you can 'offset' any amount of meat consumption, and maybe that's OK ethically. http://slatestarcodex.com/2017/08/28/contra-askell-on-moral-offsets/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I didn’t know you were an advocate for the abolition of livestock agriculture.
-
I've got no problem with free-range cows on well-cared-for pastureland; I just think chickens and pigs in cages are unethical.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I thought that table was a joke wow things are getting weirder by the day
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’ll stick to eating rib-eye & being shredded.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For some reason they seem to think using a similar number of syllables minus the animal works as a substitute... but you need to actually capture the meaning of the original phrase. I’d say only 1.5 of these accomplish this
-
Whose bright idea was it to start giving birds scones? That's actually really bad for them... even for a stupid idea this isn't especially thought out
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is why, as a rational human being, I think political correctness is really thought regulation, not human civility.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Growing field and row crops causes more animal suffering than raising livestock. The issue isn't meat, it's food. The problem remains until we can synthesize/replicate from air and space rocks instead of "harvesting" the world.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.