You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Certainly not the first two, the third depends on the traits, but I admit that I'm responding without looking up definitions of eugenics. Individual mate selection/preference is not eugenics; population-level selection/enforcement (w bad arguments attached) is.
I think it's important to distinguish between libertarian eugenics (encouraging people to make good mate choices & use of genetic tech) versus authoritarian eugenics (coercive state programs that impose family policies). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics#Implementation_methods …
I agree, and like the formal distinction, with one caveat: I am suspicious of genetic tech for the same reasons I'm suspicious of all "we've got this!" fixes that are employed without a full understanding of the complexities that we're messing with.
It would seem to me that the main problem with gene tech is you run the risk of "designing away" your biodiversity, and in the long game your biodiversity is your strength against changing environmental conditions. I stand to be corrected, but that's my take...?
well, libertarian eugenics would be subjected to individual freedom of choice, so, would that still be considered eugenics?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
