You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Wrong question. Ethics presumes rationality and reflection. Sexual selection is the result of a mixture of unconscious evolutionary and cultural preference. The concept of "selection" is ambiguous. It seems to indicate a conscious choice that the biological context excludes.
So we can't call an impulsive murder 'unethical' since it didn't involve rationality and reflection?
we don't call hitting a person who jump in front of a car unethical because there was no aim to wound/kill. We don't call legitimate defense killing unethical because the killing is just a side effect of protecting oneself. Impulsive murder is still murder: the aim is to kill.
The answer depends on the level of behavioural control, free will and accountability one is willing to attribute to an agent. A lion killing a human cannot be held accountable, in humans lack of emotional constraint in action could be judged unethical, but not necessarily so.
"Murder" implies intent. We do not call killing someone without knowledge 'unethical.' The problem lies in the presupposition of your premise: knowledgeable action which may hypothetically and ambiguous impact millions is equivalent to fucking a hot cave-chick. They aren't.
In hindsight, I should have said "... equivalent to hormonally crazed cave-teens getting it on." Makes the point a bit more clearly.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
