Is there a component of libertarianism that you would like to understand better? Post it in the comments and see if someone can help answer your question.
-
What do you mean by "bad" though? Bad is too vague for them not to dance around. There will never be evidence on economic grounds, b/c true open borders (meaning, no welfare state either) is indisputably great for the economy. But on a social cohesion level, you might make ground
I was thinking 'bad' in terms of illiberal attitudes, values, & world-views increasing if some immigrants aren't actually open to libertarian reasoning. Then we've freedom'ed ourselves into anti-freedom.
-
-
Was it Quakers in Philadelphia that tolerated all sects until it tolerated sufficient intolerant people that they banded together and abolished religious tolerance? It's an interesting problem, like electing people who propose abolishing elections.
-
Popper identified these paradoxes, though unfortunately the paradox of tolerance is now commonly used to support censoring anyone we don't like rather than only those destroying debate itself through violence and opposition to reasoned argument
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.