For all the increased awareness around consent nowadays, I'm a little surprised there hasn't been bleedover into libertarianesque stuff, considering the prime value of that stuff is basically 'violating my consent is bad'
But the libertarian nonaggression principle is hard to square with Leftist identity politics.....
-
-
The nonaggression principle is hard to square w/ anything b/c it's not clear (to me anyway) what the principle means/should mean (beyond the slogans). I'd be interested in learning about a description of the principle w/ enough content to be of help w/ difficult political issues.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s probably because leftists treat consent as if a complicated innovation. Or they try to smuggle hokey totalitarian amendments into the concept. Normal consent is tediously obvious to libertarians. It’s not that interesting or useful to talk about.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.