Is it OK for people to advocate for the interests of groups that are larger than the individual but smaller than the human species -- like a family, neighborhood, city, nation, religion, race, or sex?
-
It's more OK if it's an honest 'growing-the-pie' kind of advocacy rather than within a zero-sum kind of situation where more for my group necessarily means less for someone else's.
Seems like group advocacy would be _especially _important in zero sum situations, no?
-
-
The ethical action would be to find a positive-sum solution. And if one can’t be found, then flip a coin. The Mafia are a good example of what happens when interfamilial relations are viewed as a zero-sum game.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
especially important for the group's continued success, maybe, but also especially corrosive for a sense of civility and peace and inter-group relations across groups
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.