In a moral sense, which is a better state of the world in your view? (a) 100 animals are raised for meat, butchered, and then eaten (b) Those 100 animals are never born/raised (and of course then not eaten)
Show this thread
Depends _entirely_ on quality of life between birth and death. See 'the logic of the larder' arguments in moral philosophy:https://concepts.effectivealtruism.org/concepts/logic-of-the-larder/ …
-
-
Why do animals have any rights whatsoever? What gives any entity rights?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.