If you want to use homeownership as a wealth-building tool, you need to: A) build new houses, and B) help low-income people to buy those houses cheaply. That is the only way it works.https://twitter.com/dhmontgomery/status/1064542316713644032 …
-
-
That's not true, since home equity will still capture A) some of the value of rising productivity (due to locational externalities), and B) any future increases in location value due to increased clustering economies.
-
Sorry,
@primalpoly has this one. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
maybe the notion of housing as a vehicle towards wealth needs to be re-examined...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Possible counterpoint: landlord-in-residence is actually a really high paying job, but doesn't have many hours per person available. We'd be better off if more people did it.
-
There's a strong principle-agent problem around things like renters taking good care of their property, ensuring maintenance happens on time, etc.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Even if the value of the house doesn't rise in value, paying off a mortgage is still providing equity that can be used as collateral for another loan or extension of credit for other investments at a later time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's the paradox of equilibrium markets: you don't want a real market to be in one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes and no. Paying rent doesn't build equity, so there's an opportunity cost issue that must be accounted for.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because economies don't grow?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.