Those're some mighty big words there, feller.
So the 2020 presidential race will be a 78-year-old guy worth $47 billion vs. a 74-year-old guy worth $3 billion. TFW when 'democracy' is really quasi-monarchical gerontocratic plutocracy.https://www.apnews.com/d1bf425e50bb42eaab4176d1f3e5fec0 …
-
-
-
Big words is as big words does.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Bloomberg is not charismatic and doesn't have much pull outside New York. Not really a South or West sort of fellow.
-
If he runs, he would be lionized by NY mainstream media, and then he would lose.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
George Washington was similar, yes?
-
Younger, but he was a sleazy land developer who bilked hundreds of soldiers out of their promised acreage
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Don't forget, dynastic as well: Rockefeller Taft Kennedy Roosevelt Bush
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mark Cuban would do better
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In odd way maybe we're better off electing old billionaires. Less easily corruptible .. probably wont sell out for mere millions like others. Often want to give back in old age even if only to feel good about themselves. Presumably understand how to be effective better than most.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.