Lots of couples love to watch porn together. Helps keep long-term relationships fun and happy. Why deny couples that?
-
New conversation
-
-
-
Puritanism came first. Then the doomed attempt at a coherent argument.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This ^^^^ is why I follow you, sir.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and most literally cooking
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's comforting to know that there are enlightened people like
@McAllisterDen who are willing to take on the unpleasant and arduous task of deciding for others what all of us can and can't do with our bodies to earn money. Is teaching OK? What about cooking food? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Ban farmers. They shouldn't have to use their bodies to feed my (literal) appetites.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why can’t people who think having a sexual appetite is immoral just say so? Obviously that’s the real problem for someone who says something like this: not that it’s a “selfish” appetite (most or all appetites are selfish), but that it’s an immoral one. Disingenuousness is gross
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The anti-porn argument by
@McAllisterDen is simply unbelievably patronizing, shallow, and egocentric. On par with "Yes, of course we should have formal teacher-led prayers in schools. Oh, but only the prayers I WANT. Not some other religion's prayers."Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.