Econ question: So, big companies now basically auction where they'll open an office, with cities/states/counties bidding via tax breaks. Naively, you'd think they'd eventually equilibrate to where the city nets juuuust over zero. Has this been studied empirically?
-
-
It would be just over zero if politicians were robots. But they’re humans with glaring overconfidence biases (and plausibly corrupt tendencies) leading to fiscally negative impact across the board.
-
“Across the board” that seems unlikely, unless you discount value to customers and shareholders. In which case, yeah, nought for government coffers *directly*, but still a better world with the company than without.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.