-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It's hard to do science if you can't get a job doing science.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Does tenure now fail to provide adequate protection to allow tackling provocative topics? If it does not, is this journal a treatment for the symptom and not the root cause? Could it be more harmful by allowing the root cause to fester? Genuine questions
-
Tenure just means you (probably) don't lose your job. It doesn't protect against blowback in terms of colleagues, grants, conference talks, book publishing, recruiting students, harassment, etc etc etc.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
1 Removal of such incentives would increase the intrinsic value of the scholarship itself.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1) To spread knowledge 2) Must be standards to address this and a "don't let your guard down" culture upheld
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting. True that doxxing would be a risk. But on the other hand, even if the authors can be guessed, the formal anonymity can provide plausible deniability that would be useful where universities just want protection from public criticism for keeping that person.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What if the journal’s editor re-wrote every article their own style using semantically equivalent language?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Time for papers written by Lain Iwakura and Boaty McBoatface... :P
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
