Why not both? It's good to have people who have interesting ideas. Who want to share them. And it's good to have listeners who don't follow every word. But are people who can think for themselves.
We don't need any more 'thought leaders'. We need more 'thought followers' who take their own thoughts seriously, and follow them wherever they lead -- without fear, self-deception, or self-censorship.
-
-
-
Partly here I'm making fun of the self-appointed 'thought leaders' who tend to give TED talks, and who often don't follow their thoughts where they could really lead...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There are good thought caravans on both sides
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
What's wrong with changing your mind? Logical coherence is good, but not better than having the best answer.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What we have is the result of the few people that take the steps you mentioned, and they're so few we make them leaders. Even if we had more, the better ones would become much more better leaders. And that's indeed, a desirable goal
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We need more thoughtful leaders who lead , not for personal gain or personal power but for the benefit of those they lead. Try that. It may be good.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Got a toe or two draggin off that Kanye bandwagon eh?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah we need to stop mixing half-baked thought, entertainment, and big money a la
@jordanbpetersonThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.