I've got no problem with people getting excited about national renewal and hope for the future.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
a leader of a nation should recognize the arc of history and see nations as a temporary organizational system after empires and before global society. nationalism defines itself in opposition to globalism, and is therefore a dead-end ideology. Earth is one family, not “countries”
-
the project of the brief window of time we call “history” is the gradual force of technology causing our animal origins to shed, and the spiritual truth of our unity to be revealed. this process is messy and uneven, but history is a boot up sequence for humanity, not our “nature”
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Civic nationalism, yes.
@MsMelChenThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There you go, there is a group in this country who believe in the world order. If they take over were just one step away from having the UN run this country.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
let’s not pretend we are not talking about Trump and that his “nationalism” involves seeing people from brown countries as less than people from this nation
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i voted no. though, i guess it depends on how one takes “nationalism”. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/nationalism In the sense of supreme self interest, obviously no. In the sense of reasonable self interest, as each average person, of course yes.
-
some skumbag added that image on that site. :( but otherwise. the American Heritage Dictionary is the best.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
In the nation of Mediocrastan...
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.