False flag attacks have been common for centuries. Given any act of apparent political terrorism, journalists should always be asking: Why these targets? Why this timing? Who really benefits? Could this be yet another false flag? Not asking = incentivizing more false flags.
-
-
Any hot new leads in your investigation today Geoffrey?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When have you done that? Shoot a link
-
He answered a hypothetical.
-
But republicans have been targeted in the past? When did he question if any of them was a false flag?
-
That has nothing to do with the hypothetical that he answered.
-
Yes it does? He was asked if he would ask these questions if Republicans have been targeted. Republicans HAVE been targeted. Link me him asking these same questions
-
No, it doesn't, because he didn't say whether or not this was some consistent position of his since time immemorial. He said, as of this point, he would be just as apt to be skeptical of such a coordinated effort. You can either accept it or not.
-
"I never thought anything could be a false flag until bad things happened to the people I disagree with!" Yeah I don't accept this I'm not stupid nice try.
-
You seem to be putting an awful lot of words in people's mouths.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lol no you wouldn’t and you know that you wouldn’t
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Then link us to the tweet where you did so about the recent Mattis ricin incident.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.