The idea that you can use DNA to answer questions about citizenship and cultural heritage is woven into some of the worst tendencies in human history. I am distressed to see Sen. Warren playing into that
If the results showed that her DNA was 75% Cherokee, would you be complaining that this is irrelevant to her ancestry claims?
-
-
Is this question a challenge to the possibility that DNA might be irrelevant to citizenship and cultural heritage?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.