Geoffrey MillerVerified account

It means these so-called disciplines are fake and should be defunded by the universities.

I read some of the abstracts from the New Real Peer Review account to some of my colleagues. We were all flabbergasted by the impenetrable prose and the micro focus on self experience and “othering”

It's interesting that the hoaxers failed in all their early attempts. Then they used a religious frame that revolved around resentment, sin and retribution and, suddenly, papers were sailing through.

Who?

They have no incentives to change unfortunately. In most western universities, there's no penalty for spewing systematic bias and calling it "research."

OK thanks. I'll check these out although the two that I saw did not seem to come from EP folks.

So Kold...