If you could live to be 200 years old while staying healthy and active, how many great-great-great-great grandkids would you ideally want to have?
-
-
What if I want some of them to actually just be clones?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
if any of them married each other (quite likely unless somehow discouraged) more of my genes would get through.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Zero” is the most reasonable answer for me. Who am I to wish a burden of responsibility on my own descendants in an increasingly unsustainable world?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Selfish gene theory holds that this need not be borne in mind.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeeeesss...I chose wisely
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think that's wrong: you pass 1/2 of your genes to your offspring (A) by random selection. Next generation picks at random 1/2 of all the genes of (A): the ones you passed account for 0 to 100% of this selection. Fraction varies between 0 and 1/4. 1/2^n = upper bound, not total.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The problem is if you're not dying you're not making room for new gen. If we expand human lives to 200 and all are having 5 kids a piece, well real estate values are seriously going to get out of hand! I get darwinian frame but personal I like a world with some nature left.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How else do you propose to keep myself young? https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0457-8 …pic.twitter.com/IrTwSi8Xko
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.