It matters a lot to the people and animals that benefit from effective charity.
It beggars belief that billionaires smart enough to run massive companies still give away their charity dollars in random virtue-signalling ways, instead of researching what's most cost-effective and evidence-based, e.g. as recommended by @open_phil and @GiveWellhttps://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/1042154543797161990 …
-
New conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes there are. But they're hard to analyze.
End of conversation
-
-
-
They ~aren't~ smart enough to run massive companies. The hired help does that. Drakes Billionaire Equation: Sufficient IQ x Right Place X Right Time X Right Friends X Right lucky mistakes (etc.). (In sheer numbers, IQ ~130 outnumber 160's, who are nerds anyway.) (Damore v Sergey)
-
(Hmm. If 160+ is three in 100,000 persons, and 130+ is three in 1000, then roughly 100 times as many with IQ 130 as 160?) https://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/iqtable.aspx ..
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
What if he just paid his workers more? Does that take the fun out of it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.