Really. A lot of folks in ev psych are getting pretty tired of you bashing our field without understanding it very well, and without making clear what kind of evidence would lead you to change your mind on anything.
-
-
I’m a bit of an outsider here and am having a bit of trouble navigating the literature to get an estimate of the additive genetic variance of males’ preferred mate age. Do you know of any? I’m doodling with a genetic model and could use a plausible range of values.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Evolutionary psychology. Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. Confer JC1, Easton JA, Fleischman DS, Goetz CD, Lewis DM, Perilloux C, Buss DM. http://www.academia.edu/2867507/Evolutionary_psychology_Controversies_questions_prospects_and_limitations …pic.twitter.com/Vh6iHCkVpk
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It might be because your field, if
#evolutionary psychology is 'your field,' has demonstrated significant recent corruption, e.g. Hauser & Stapel. Likewise,#eVopsych proponents are almost 100%, to a man or woman, atheists & agnostics. This distorts the field in obvious bad ways.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.