Not with the NY Times promoting the pro-death trance so hard.
This piece by @aarieff is the most ethically disgusting thing I've ever read in the @NYTimesOpinion. And that's saying a lot.
If you want to die, fine. But don't keep the rest of us from developing the option not to.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/18/opinion/life-is-short-thats-the-point.html …pic.twitter.com/0S6HQ0X7Nw
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Deterring people from developing regenerative medicine for longevity is even more unethical than deterring people from developing a cure for cancer on the grounds that 'cancer is integral to being human'
End of conversation
-
-
-
How about infant mortality version from 1918? https://twitter.com/SteveStuWill/status/1031364084057272320 …pic.twitter.com/cIl56MLb7c
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Human life has meaning because we are complex sentient beings, not because we are forced to die by our imperfect biology.
- 2 more replies
-
-
-
How in the world can you find this ethically disgusting? What unsightly level of ego must you maintain to feel so entitled to demand the resource consumption that will be required by going on and on... and on... and on?
-
Oh come on, do you really want to make people feel guilty for being alive?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Until we can live without requiring the death of another life form to exist, we are the bound ethically, to accept our role in the circle of life and death. To think we are not, is typically the ego or an unresolved fear of our own nothingness.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.