"For decades, China harshly restricted the number of babies that women could have. Now it is encouraging them to have more. It is not going well." Governments should stay out of the marriage & baby business, & stay out of the bedroom altogether.https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/11/world/asia/china-one-child-policy-birthrate.html#click=https://t.co/OxHED7eNra …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Correct. I think we need more pronatalist policies, since gov't incentives overall still have a somewhat antinatalist bias.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Taxation is theft, so...yes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, the population induced pandemic is nigh...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Make abortions government funded and as a culture we should try to get rid of the guilt associated with abortions, while trying to increasing the guilt for having children before having financial stability.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
“Euphoric happiness from childbirth” is a “scientific fact”?? Citation needed! And why then would postpartum depression exist? But also, this is irrelevant to the above points

- 2 more replies
-
-
-
Exactly, same goes for marriage. It's easier said than done, that a state shouldn't interfere. Because so many policies depend an the legal status of a relational commitment.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, and not only does almost every policy impact the total birth rate, it also affects its demographic distribution - it changes *who* has how many babies. Refusal to do it deliberately simply means getting an uncontrolled result, because there is indeed little truly neutral.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.