Isn't that all of them?
-
-
-
Pretty much.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
A few things wrong with your post. First, it’s obvious now that it was flimsy and fabricated. Second, the government didn’t use fabricated news reports for intelligence. Some of those reports came from British intelligence.
-
It was blindingly obvious to me at the time, and to almost everyone I knew, that the Iraq war was cynical neocon adventurism that had _nothing_ to do with 9/11. The press just didn't have the guts to say so, because war = ratings, or whatever their incentives were.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Even more radical idea: the government should do likewise.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Something like the critical retrospective published by The New York Times in 2004? https://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/26/world/from-the-editors-the-times-and-iraq.html …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“News” outlets shouldn’t “support” anything. They should simply report the news.
#TheProblemWithLibsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’d like to know what about the intel was “flimsy & fabricated.”
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Almost no one in journalism or politics knows the basics about production of fissionable materials and nuclear weapons. Or Middle Eastern politics and history. You're asking them to be someone else - me.
-
If only they had the skills to find and interview people who did know a lot about these topics.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.