Facebook, Apple, YouTube/Google, Spotify are ostensibly 4 diverse independent actors acting together. Coordinated corporate action like this is a serious problem that has nothing whatsoever to do w/ the various peculiarities of the target here. What are we seeing? What is this?https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1026534085634793473 …
-
Jesus Christ, guys. Why is it so hard to believe that they finally saw the light that this content is shit and bad for them? I understand you want diversity of thought, but these companies are making a smart business decision.
I'm just saying their 'smart business decision' may not be as smart as they think given the likely blowback, and it's deeply unethical in any case.
-
-
You don't know what "unethical" means.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Alex Jones is a danger to society. It is these companies responsibility to protect their other consumers from him. The companies are actually acting ethically by banning him.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How is it unethical to not let him use their service for purposes they don’t like? They don’t owe him *anything*. Also, let’s see how these companies “suffer” for this decision
-
They ban a lot of people, however whenever a right wing conspiracy nut job is banned all of a sudden the establishment comes into play
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.