Suggestion: don't accuse people of making 'bad faith' arguments unless you can give some specific examples of what 'good faith' arguments would look like, from their point of view.
-
No, because that sets up the application of several logical fallacies. No, you need to just accept the argument as stated and address it's points. If it's bad faith, then it won't hold up to scrutiny as it is indefensible. If the argument has merit, the source is irrelevant
